| Referendum 67 has not received much publicity, and this is bad for voters as we need to understand the issue before the November election.
It is very clear to those who read the referendum that it is written by trial lawyers for the benefit of trial lawyers. It does not benefit the consumers in our state, who will pay horrific costs if it passes. For example, Ref. 67 allows for triple damages to be paid for insurance claims. Of course, the money has to come from somewhere — yes, from you and from me; those who buy insurance will pay and pay, in the form of higher insurance rates. Let’s face it, we live in a litigious society and we simply must have insurance, but will we be able to afford it if the trial lawyers have their way?
It is very interesting that the trial lawyers sponsored a similar law in California. The result was an 82 percent increase in auto accident lawsuits and a 50 percent increase in liability lawsuits. California voters eventually overturned the law. Let us learn from those voters. Vote NO on Referendum 67.
In the interest of full disclosure, I am not an insurance agent, nor am I related in any way to the insurance industry. I just buy insurance to protect me and my family.
Joan W. Gorner
Poulsbo
|
